|
What is Noetic
science and why is it important?
We need to remind
ourselves from time to time why this endeavor in which we have joined
seems significant, and to reassess where we are.
A new science is arising, a science of the human mind much broader than
psychology has been to date. We have called it "Noetic" science,
after the Greek word for intuitive knowing. Perhaps it is somewhat
inaccurate to speak of it as though it were totally new; it might be
better to refer to a Noetic emphasis in the human sciences. But the
radical nature of the developments should not be underestimated. It is the
second stage of a two-stage process.
Noetic
comes from the Greek word for intuitive knowing.
The first stage, the rise of modern materialistic science, is one of the
most important evolutionary leaps in human history. Its essence embodies a
remarkable proposition, namely that knowledge of the objective
sense-perceived world should not be based on religious or traditional
authority, nor the guarded property of an elite priesthood, but should be
empirically based and publicly verifiable, open and free to all.
Thus there is not
Russian chemistry and American chemistry, or Hindu physics and Christian
physics. There is only science — the best framework of empirical
relationships and conceptual models currently available, continuously
tested in public by agreed-upon procedures.
The goal of the second stage, just begun, is creation of a similar body of
knowledge, empirically based and publicly validated, about the realm of
subjective experience. For the first time in history we are beginning to
create a growing, progressively funded body of established experience
about humanity's inner life — and particularly about the perennial
wisdom of the great religious traditions and Gnostic groups.
For the first
time there is hope that this knowledge can become — not a secret
repeatedly lost in dogmatization and institutionalization, or degenerating
into manifold varieties of cultism and occultism — but rather the living
heritage of all humankind.
This extension of scientific exploration, which we have termed Noetic,
differs from the materialistic science of the past in a number of ways.
It is centrally concerned with subjective experience where materialistic
science has dealt almost entirely with objective, sensory experience. To
the reductionistic models of materialistic science it adds holistic
models; to deterministic explanations of events it adds teleological,
purpose - recognizing explanations.
Where materialistic
science was largely value - inattentive, Noetic science is centrally
concerned with value issues. Materialistic science has tended to test
knowledge by noting whether it leads to the ability to predict and
control; while the consensus on validation of Noetic sciences has not yet
emerged, it seems clear that it will have more to do with understanding
than prediction, and more with joining than control.
Furthermore, it seems likely that the Noetic sciences will evolve in a way
quite different from the evolution of materialistic science. The latter
dealt with genuinely new discoveries, and as a result the changing view of
reality in the culture tended to lag behind that of the scientists. In the
case of the new science of subjective experience it is otherwise.
In part, at least,
we are dealing here with rediscovery of truths that in some sense
have been discovered over and over again, and have left their track in the
culture more rapidly than in the scientific community. Changes in the view
of reality held in the culture tend to lead to corresponding changes in
the sciences; for example, the role of psychological attitudes such as
faith in healing, and the conviction of spiritual reality that comes with
certain altered states of consciousness.
Because the Noetic sciences are partially a process of rediscovery it is
possible to anticipate what some of the essential characteristics will be.
The new science is not really new. It is the esoteric core of all the
world's religions, East and West, ancient and modern, becoming exoteric,
"going public." As Aldus Huxley describes this "perennial
wisdom," it "recognizes a Divine Reality substantial to
the world of things and lives and minds ... finds in the soul something
similar to, or even identical with, divine Reality ... places man's final
end in the knowledge of the immanent and transcendent God of all
Being."
Whether it is implied by extrapolation from biofeedback training or
psychic phenomena and the evidence for psychosomatic origins of illness,
or whether arising from immediate intuitive experience, the fundamental
profound insight appears to be recognition that in some important sense
"I am cause and creator." In some sense much more fundamental
than is implied in conventional psychology, our belief systems create our
reality.
The fact that the key characteristics of the emerging knowledge can be
anticipated is very significant. It means that there is no need to wait
decades, until the new science begins to take more definite shape, before
beginning to act on its basic principles. The influence of these
principles can be brought to bear on social and business decision-making
right now.
It is generally
recognized that industrialized society is at a crisis point. Choices
relating to energy, environment, control of technology, growth,
employment, land use, economic incentives, government and business roles,
all seem to present more and more unpalatable trade-offs, and seem in this
fact to indicate an underlying fundamental change of direction.
Western
political tradition, based in a Judeo-Christian ethic, a force that has
declined as the industrial-era paradigm has gained in influence, is
wracked with self-doubts. Nation after nation is retreating from
democracy. Contemporary political, economic, environmental, and social
crises are reflections of an underlying moral and spiritual crisis of
industrial civilization. |